A dear friend forwarded me the below editorial yesterday, and as one would expect, I vehemently disagreed with Mr. Shapiro’s position. I am prone to deconstruct the essay, which one can find by clicking on the picture.
For Mr. Shapiro’s first point, the San Francisco sewage plant, it was a proposition in San Francisco. One could find that a city permitting a gay pride parade or another commemoration classless. Perhaps the citizens voting for that “classless and disrespectful” measure learned something from those dismissing exculpatory evidence during Whitewater? In this instance, they had a sense of humor about what to name something that removes waste. I enjoy how Mr. Shapiro uses the phrase, “many Americans,” lest we not forget this is a democracy. Our first questions should be about where and who descended our politics to this level in the first place, something over which we should all stop to think. President-elect Obama cited those immature in their dissent from persons’ political positions in his speech. How did we arrive at this level of immaturity?
“Mr. Bush has endured relentless attacks from the left while facing abandonment from the right.” Relentless attacks from the left? Yes, well I suppose when one has been at the helm of a ship driving into an iceberg, perhaps they deserve dissension. I don’t have the time or space for concision to lay out all of the ways this President and his administration have governed so poorly, but putting us into a war under false pretenses might be a one-off that one could mention.
Particularly, I enjoy the non sequitur used with the following passage:
“During his 2004 victory speech, the president reached out to voters who supported his opponent, John Kerry, and said, "Today, I want to speak to every person who voted for my opponent. To make this nation stronger and better, I will need your support, and I will work to earn it. I will do all I can do to deserve your trust." Those bipartisan efforts have been met with crushing resistance from both political parties.”
I am beginning to detect a theme from this essay. He uses simply the words of the man, not his actions to support his point. In this case, Mr. Shapiro uses the President’s words subsequent an election, and speaks as though his administration “worked to earn our support,” or “did all it could to deserve our trust.” What evidence does Mr. Shapiro provide to support that President Bush has done these things, and has been mistreated otherwise? He provides no supporting evidence.
Mr. Shapiro in his next paragraphs mentions a litany of political failures by the Bush administration; however, he does nothing but highlight areas where Bush has miserably failed. Reading this is laughable, and is being published in a paper purchased by the same individuals who own Fox News. I can continue to write over this, but would ask that you look at any one of these qualitative propositions, and tell me where I am wrong. This essay is perhaps the ultimate in the Right’s insults to our intelligence.
For Mr. Shapiro’s first point, the San Francisco sewage plant, it was a proposition in San Francisco. One could find that a city permitting a gay pride parade or another commemoration classless. Perhaps the citizens voting for that “classless and disrespectful” measure learned something from those dismissing exculpatory evidence during Whitewater? In this instance, they had a sense of humor about what to name something that removes waste. I enjoy how Mr. Shapiro uses the phrase, “many Americans,” lest we not forget this is a democracy. Our first questions should be about where and who descended our politics to this level in the first place, something over which we should all stop to think. President-elect Obama cited those immature in their dissent from persons’ political positions in his speech. How did we arrive at this level of immaturity?
“Mr. Bush has endured relentless attacks from the left while facing abandonment from the right.” Relentless attacks from the left? Yes, well I suppose when one has been at the helm of a ship driving into an iceberg, perhaps they deserve dissension. I don’t have the time or space for concision to lay out all of the ways this President and his administration have governed so poorly, but putting us into a war under false pretenses might be a one-off that one could mention.
Particularly, I enjoy the non sequitur used with the following passage:
“During his 2004 victory speech, the president reached out to voters who supported his opponent, John Kerry, and said, "Today, I want to speak to every person who voted for my opponent. To make this nation stronger and better, I will need your support, and I will work to earn it. I will do all I can do to deserve your trust." Those bipartisan efforts have been met with crushing resistance from both political parties.”
I am beginning to detect a theme from this essay. He uses simply the words of the man, not his actions to support his point. In this case, Mr. Shapiro uses the President’s words subsequent an election, and speaks as though his administration “worked to earn our support,” or “did all it could to deserve our trust.” What evidence does Mr. Shapiro provide to support that President Bush has done these things, and has been mistreated otherwise? He provides no supporting evidence.
Mr. Shapiro in his next paragraphs mentions a litany of political failures by the Bush administration; however, he does nothing but highlight areas where Bush has miserably failed. Reading this is laughable, and is being published in a paper purchased by the same individuals who own Fox News. I can continue to write over this, but would ask that you look at any one of these qualitative propositions, and tell me where I am wrong. This essay is perhaps the ultimate in the Right’s insults to our intelligence.
Mr. Shapiro, One reaps what they sow...
The Treatment of Bush Has Been a Disgrace
What must our enemies be thinking?
By JEFFREY SCOTT SHAPIRO
WSJ—November 5, 2008
Earlier this year, 12,000 people in San Francisco signed a petition in support of a proposition on a local ballot to rename an Oceanside sewage plant after George W. Bush. The proposition is only one example of the classless disrespect many Americans have shown the president.
According to recent Gallup polls, the president's average approval rating is below 30% -- down from his 90% approval in the wake of 9/11. Mr. Bush has endured relentless attacks from the left while facing abandonment from the right.
This is the price Mr. Bush is paying for trying to work with both Democrats and Republicans. During his 2004 victory speech, the president reached out to voters who supported his opponent, John Kerry, and said, "Today, I want to speak to every person who voted for my opponent. To make this nation stronger and better, I will need your support, and I will work to earn it. I will do all I can do to deserve your trust."
Those bipartisan efforts have been met with crushing resistance from both political parties.
The president's original Supreme Court choice of Harriet Miers alarmed Republicans, while his final nomination of Samuel Alito angered Democrats. His solutions to reform the immigration system alienated traditional conservatives, while his refusal to retreat in Iraq has enraged liberals who have unrealistic expectations about the challenges we face there.
It seems that no matter what Mr. Bush does, he is blamed for everything. He remains despised by the left while continuously disappointing the right.
Yet it should seem obvious that many of our country's current problems either existed long before Mr. Bush ever came to office, or are beyond his control. Perhaps if Americans stopped being so divisive, and congressional leaders came together to work with the president on some of these problems, he would actually have had a fighting chance of solving them.
Like the president said in his 2004 victory speech, "We have one country, one Constitution and one future that binds us. And when we come together and work together, there is no limit to the greatness of America."
To be sure, Mr. Bush is not completely alone. His low approval ratings put him in the good company of former Democratic President Harry S. Truman, whose own approval rating sank to 22% shortly before he left office. Despite Mr. Truman's low numbers, a 2005 Wall Street Journal poll found that he was ranked the seventh most popular president in history.
Just as Americans have gained perspective on how challenging Truman's presidency was in the wake of World War II, our country will recognize the hardship President Bush faced these past eight years -- and how extraordinary it was that he accomplished what he did in the wake of the September 11 attacks.
The treatment President Bush has received from this country is nothing less than a disgrace. The attacks launched against him have been cruel and slanderous, proving to the world what little character and resolve we have. The president is not to blame for all these problems. He never lost faith in America or her people, and has tried his hardest to continue leading our nation during a very difficult time.
Our failure to stand by the one person who continued to stand by us has not gone unnoticed by our enemies. It has shown to the world how disloyal we can be when our president needed loyalty -- a shameful display of arrogance and weakness that will haunt this nation long after Mr. Bush has left the White House.
The Treatment of Bush Has Been a Disgrace
What must our enemies be thinking?
By JEFFREY SCOTT SHAPIRO
WSJ—November 5, 2008
Earlier this year, 12,000 people in San Francisco signed a petition in support of a proposition on a local ballot to rename an Oceanside sewage plant after George W. Bush. The proposition is only one example of the classless disrespect many Americans have shown the president.
According to recent Gallup polls, the president's average approval rating is below 30% -- down from his 90% approval in the wake of 9/11. Mr. Bush has endured relentless attacks from the left while facing abandonment from the right.
This is the price Mr. Bush is paying for trying to work with both Democrats and Republicans. During his 2004 victory speech, the president reached out to voters who supported his opponent, John Kerry, and said, "Today, I want to speak to every person who voted for my opponent. To make this nation stronger and better, I will need your support, and I will work to earn it. I will do all I can do to deserve your trust."
Those bipartisan efforts have been met with crushing resistance from both political parties.
The president's original Supreme Court choice of Harriet Miers alarmed Republicans, while his final nomination of Samuel Alito angered Democrats. His solutions to reform the immigration system alienated traditional conservatives, while his refusal to retreat in Iraq has enraged liberals who have unrealistic expectations about the challenges we face there.
It seems that no matter what Mr. Bush does, he is blamed for everything. He remains despised by the left while continuously disappointing the right.
Yet it should seem obvious that many of our country's current problems either existed long before Mr. Bush ever came to office, or are beyond his control. Perhaps if Americans stopped being so divisive, and congressional leaders came together to work with the president on some of these problems, he would actually have had a fighting chance of solving them.
Like the president said in his 2004 victory speech, "We have one country, one Constitution and one future that binds us. And when we come together and work together, there is no limit to the greatness of America."
To be sure, Mr. Bush is not completely alone. His low approval ratings put him in the good company of former Democratic President Harry S. Truman, whose own approval rating sank to 22% shortly before he left office. Despite Mr. Truman's low numbers, a 2005 Wall Street Journal poll found that he was ranked the seventh most popular president in history.
Just as Americans have gained perspective on how challenging Truman's presidency was in the wake of World War II, our country will recognize the hardship President Bush faced these past eight years -- and how extraordinary it was that he accomplished what he did in the wake of the September 11 attacks.
The treatment President Bush has received from this country is nothing less than a disgrace. The attacks launched against him have been cruel and slanderous, proving to the world what little character and resolve we have. The president is not to blame for all these problems. He never lost faith in America or her people, and has tried his hardest to continue leading our nation during a very difficult time.
Our failure to stand by the one person who continued to stand by us has not gone unnoticed by our enemies. It has shown to the world how disloyal we can be when our president needed loyalty -- a shameful display of arrogance and weakness that will haunt this nation long after Mr. Bush has left the White House.
6 comments:
I found the article interesting. Take it as whole and you see the bigger point.
Barack Obama made it a large part of his campaign to empower the American people and ensure them that they are just as much a part of government as he is. He told us that this country was great, because we had the ability to do great things. Thus, I have to think...if this country is not great, is it because; we - the American people - have not been great?
I have many friends that have been shipped to Iraq to fight for our country. It amazes me that not one of them leaves or returns blaming Bush. Instead, they give their life for this country and have the utmost respect their leaders.
Most of us don’t give our lives for our country. We live for ourselves and expect one man, the President, to hand us a great economy, thriving schools, low gas prices, and hope that best years are yet to come.
If we took at a good hard look at ourselves, we would recognize, that the only person we can ultimately blame for these wrongs are ourselves. Are we a reflection of our government? The problem with this country is not that we have a bad President; it’s that we are selfish, greedy, and mean. We don’t respect authority unless we are fat and rich. I don’t blame Bush, I blame myself for the last 8 years. This is MY country, I am responsible too.
Dear Maria,
While what you are saying is genuinely noble, there are a few points disconnected from the state of things with the article and your feelings about our responsibility versus the government’s responsibility. What Obama was saying that this country is a partnership, and for it to be great, both the government and the people have to be great. I would submit to you that in the case of the Bush Administration, they have failed in this partnership. We as citizens have not failed, but in the case of Bush, the government has failed miserably. That is why our democracy’s citizens opinions of Bush are so low; in addition, that is a large reason as to why Obama was elected.
None of your friends that returned from Iraq blame Bush. That is good to hear. Most soldiers don’t criticize the government for which they fight. However, there are many who do disagree with the Bush Doctrine on the war, and who voted against him or wanted to. Take this article from 2004, for example: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2004/oct/25/uselections2004.usa2.
I think it is ever so ever noble to blame yourself for the last eight years, but Maria did not get us into a preemptive war in Iraq under lies, which at the time were attempted to be disproved. Of course, those who disproved the lies, or tried to, were punished for it: Scott Ritter, Valerie Plame, et al. This is the administration that with a Republican congress continuously passed tax cuts for the wealthiest citizens and corporations, etc… I could go on and on. The indictment of Bush as horrible is in no way an indictment upon this country. If one is being lied to, it is not their fault if they act in the interest of actions predicated on the assumption of lies, and there is a bad outcome. It’s naïve to think otherwise.
Money Quote - Matty:
"Yes, well I suppose when one has been at the helm of a ship driving into an iceberg, perhaps they deserve dissension."
Couldn't be more true. I don't understand how this country has moved further away from this ideal in so many ways over the past 8 years. Well, I do understand- Patriot Act, Fox News, etc., but it still frustrates me to no end. The left and center allowed this the political discourse to be hijacked in the name of patriotism. Let's hope that under an Obama administration dissension is seen as a virtue and a strength. And if for some surprising reason it isn't, let's fight hard to see a reemergence of such an important democratic value.
I guess I think it's naive of us to think that the problems we have are because of someone else. I think it's naive of us to serve ourselves and expect others to serve us too. I think it's naive to not respect elected leaders, senior citizens, or our parents. If you think you are above these things - then I think you are naive.
Additionally, I would encourage you to run for public office. Perhaps then you could be part of the solution, and not the finger pointing.
Maria, I am not saying that there are no problems in this country that are not to blame on its citizens; however, when it comes to the unfettered economic policy that put us in the credit default / derivatives issue; when it comes to putting us at war in Iraq under false pretenses with plans to do so prior to 9-11; when it comes to changing the tax structure such that our economic disparity is far and away the greatest in the world, between the rich and poor, I am saying that the Republican party under George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Tom DeLay, and John McCain is at fault.
Now, respectfully, where you are getting the following points, I don’t know, but I am going to quote some of your premises and respond to them:
“I think it's naive of us to serve ourselves and expect others to serve us too.” I am not espousing we should be “served.” From where is that coming? Please provide evidence.
“I think it's naive to not respect elected leaders, senior citizens, or our parents.” I am going to quote Dwight Eisenhower, “Here in America we are descended in blood and in spirit from revolutionists and rebels - men and women who dare to dissent from accepted doctrine. As their heirs, may we never confuse honest dissent with disloyal subversion.”
As for running for public office, at the moment, I cannot. However, I do volunteer for non-profit NGOs. I hope that’s good enough to be part of the solution. If it’s not, then we’ll have to put a plan together.
You two and your awesome discourse. Love it and love you both. :)
Post a Comment